Understanding moral injury: when telling the truth breaks you and how healing begins

When I exposed misconduct in the pharmaceutical industry, I understood there would be consequences. I was prepared for professional retaliation including loss of income, loss of status, the whisper campaign. But I did not anticipate the deeper rupture and the disorientation that followed. The sense that the world I believed in, where truth and integrity mattered, were no longer relevant.

• Read more

  Unlike the typical attention-grabbing headlines of today, this was not a mob scene with paid actors screaming profanities, causing mayhem and violence. I told the truth about illegal prescription drug marketing and then stood utterly alone. Colleagues who witnessed the same thing I did, went silent out of fear of losing their jobs. Corporate America reframed and rewrote events to hide their culpability. Truth became negotiable and was turned upside down. What I experienced has a name: moral injury.

  It is a term that originated in military psychology but has expanded in recent years into healthcare, public service, journalism, and other professions where individuals face ethical betrayal. Researchers define moral injury as the psychological, social, and spiritual harm that results from perpetrating, witnessing, or being subjected to acts that violate deeply held moral beliefs.  Unlike post-traumatic stress disorder, which is rooted in fear and threat to survival, moral injury is rooted in violation of conscience and betrayal of trust.

  And moral injury is also distinct from “burnout,” which stems from depletion-too much work, too little recovery. Moral injury is different: it's the psychological distress that results when a worker is forced to act against their core values, or witnesses serious wrongdoing they cannot stop. When an employee experiences a moral injury, it's not because that individual has an individual health problem; it's often because there is something wrong in the work environment that is causing harm.  In employment law, moral injury drives whistleblowing responses, legal claiming, and other reactions. And in September 2025, the American Psychiatric Association formally recognized it in the DSM-5-TR.

  PTSD is characterized by hypervigilance, intrusive memories, and physiological fear responses. Moral injury, by contrast, often manifests as shame, anger, loss of meaning, social withdrawal, and a fractured sense of identity. It is not simply distress. It is a rupture in one’s moral framework. There are some overlapping symptoms, especially if the person who has experienced the moral injury has also felt that their life was in danger, as I did.

  In recent years, studies have linked moral injury to depression, suicidality, and profound isolation across military and civilian populations alike.  When individuals report wrongdoing and are retaliated against, they experience a particular form of institutional betrayal. The punishment is not only economic; it is existential. The implicit message is clear: belonging is conditional on silence and integrity is expendable.

  The injury is that one’s moral action (daring to speak the truth) results in exile. Healing that kind of wound requires more than stress management. It requires restoration of trust and belonging. And this is where an unexpected source of repair changed my life: a dog.

  There is robust research on the psychophysiological effects of human–animal interaction. Studies demonstrate that interaction with dogs can reduce cortisol, increase oxytocin, lower blood pressure, and improve emotional regulation. Oxytocin, often referred to as the “bonding hormone,” plays a role in attachment, trust, and social connection — precisely the systems disrupted in moral injury.

  But the science, while important, only tells part of the story.  What I experienced was this: my dog did not care about the narrative being constructed around me. She did not evaluate credibility. She did not participate in professional politics. She responded to my nervous system, to tension, to silence. When institutions betrayed me, I could trust my dog’s predictable presence.  When my professional identity had been dismantled, caring for her restored routine and agency. When gaslighting, false narratives and financial hardship threatened to collapse my world, her steady non-judgmental presence anchored me in the present.

  In psychological terms, this is co-regulation. Mammalian nervous systems stabilize in the presence of safe attachment figures. For individuals who have been socially isolated following ethical conflict, rebuilding relational safety is foundational. A dog provides non-contingent connection that is not dependent on compliance, performance, or silence.

  This does not replace systemic reform, nor does it excuse the institutional behaviors that cause moral injury. But it does point to something essential: healing begins in relationship.  Moral injury is not weakness. In fact, it is quite the opposite. It is evidence that one’s moral compass was exquisitely intact in an environment that punished it.

  As researchers continue to refine definitions and interventions, we must expand our understanding of who carries this wound. Whistleblowers, healthcare professionals, journalists, corporate employees.  Anyone who has stood inside an ethical breach and paid for it, may be navigating moral injury without having the language for it. Giving it a name matters. So does recognizing that repair is possible through restoration of safety in the body and connection through relationship.

  Sometimes that restoration begins quietly and in unexpected places: with four steady paws, a synchronized heartbeat, and the unspoken message: you are not alone and you are worthy of belonging.